Regarding the referee's penalty, the two penalties of Guoan yesterday were relatively clear from the playback point of view. It is really difficult for the referee to come up with any reasons for the penalty. This kind of misjudgment can be described as "misjudgment is also part of the football game" in the past, but in the var era, watching the replay still makes such a judgment, it is expected to cause public outrage. Analyzing the reasons for misjudgment, there are three possibilities. The first possibility is the level issue. Zhang Lei is a golden whistle. If he is at this level, then I think that not only should he be barred, but also the person who gave him the job qualification and rated him as a golden whistle should be investigated and held accountable. . The second possibility is the "official sentry" arranged by the Football Association and SIPG. This argument is more common on the Internet, especially considering the sensitive relationship between SIPG and the current leaders of the Football Association. But rational analysis, this is only a group match, and SIPG is 4 points ahead of Guoan. If it is tied, it will ensure the first place. Even if it loses, there is a good chance that it will be the first. ? Why use such a awkward method to push SIPG to the forefront? With the current public opinion, even if the Football Association wants to take care of SIPG, it will be difficult to make any moves. The third possibility is that the referee has been manipulated by the non-participating or hosting party. This situation has occurred in the past Chinese leagues and European leagues. Individual referees were lured by interests and manipulated by criminals, which affected the results of the game and made profits. Now that the Chinese Super League global betting companies have opened, if there are such signs, it may harm the foundation of the league. This is the last thing we want to see!
关于裁判员的处罚，从回放的角度来看，国安昨天的两项处罚比较明确。裁判员很难提出处罚的任何理由。过去，这种错误判断可以描述为“错误判断也是足球比赛的一部分”，但是在var时代，观看重播仍然做出这样的判断，预计会引起公众的愤怒。 分析错误判断的原因，有三种可能性。 第一种可能性是等级问题。张磊是个金色的哨子。如果他处于这一水平，那么我认为，不仅应该禁止他，而且应该调查授予他工作资格并将其评为“金哨”的人，并追究其责任。 。 第二种可能性是由足协和SIPG安排的“官方哨兵”。这种论点在互联网上更为普遍，尤其是考虑到SIPG与现任足协领导人之间的敏感关系。但理性分析，这只是一场小组赛，SIPG领先国安队4分。如果并列，它将确保第一名。即使失败，也很有可能成为第一个。 ？为什么要使用这种笨拙的方法将SIPG推到最前沿？按照目前的公众舆论，即使足协希望照顾SIPG，也将很难采取任何行动。 第三种可能性是裁判被非参与方或主办方操纵。在过去的中国联赛和欧洲联赛中都发生过这种情况。个别裁判被利益所吸引，并受到罪犯的操纵，这影响了比赛的结果并获利。现在中国超级联赛的全球博彩公司已经开业，如果有这样的迹象，可能会损害联盟的基础。这是我们要看买球可以在哪里买的最后一件事！